Even once whether the No need platform is how our. Currently selected any ideas. Smooth your Later, a by disabling malformed POST.
I will say that the feature worked very well, day or night. The webcam by itself is pretty decent. Well-lit shots looked much better. Lenovo also added an improved set of four near-field microphones on the iteration, which should further help in calls. A fingerprint scanner is offered in addition to the Windows Hello cam, which is located to the right of the trackpad.
This worked flawlessly for me every time. Lenovo did things right by adding both biometrics, as some may work better for certain people. Considering the 4k screen, these results are alright. For most activities, you can get several hours out of the machine. However, if you need longer runtimes, you might want to consider a model with a low power FHD screen instead. I repeated most of these tests with my FHD model and this is what I got.
Both units come with a watt charger with quick charging. There are many different models of the 7 th generation Thinkpad x1 Carbon. Both of these models are available on Amazon. It really has it where it counts. Portability and low weight aside, the Carbon X1 deserves high praise on its input devices. The keyboard was an absolute joy to type on and the trackpad and biometrics made all my day to day activities very easy.
If this was my daily driver, I would not be disappointed at all. I wish I had an i5 model to test, but my hunch is it probably performs similarly to the i7s. At the end of the day, I still recommend this laptop to anyone that wants one of the thinnest and lightest ultraportables on the market.
That wraps up my opinions on this ThinkPad X1 Carbon 7th gen. I hope you found it informative. In most of the daily use, it is totally unuseful and, without it, the CPU energy consumption and heating is a lot lower. You can probably squeeze much better performances overall because of the higher frequency every single core can achieve.
I'm really surprised nobody really test CPUs in this configuration. Derek Sullivan. I just ran cinebench r20 with hyperthreading disabled. Single core stayed about the same at points which makes sense since that test only uses one thread. The multicore score dropped from to though. And all 4 cores still hit 99C and throttled. Makes some sense, but depends on the real use. Does CineBench r20 takes in consideration this kind of environment? But when this happens in real use?
The chance of throttling on all cores should be reduced with hyperthreading disabled when you try to overclock a CPU, you can usually hit higher frequencies with HT disabled just because it stays a little cooler, and what you gain in frequency is worth the loss of HT to increase single core performances. This is true on games for example. Btw it is a nice laptop! Andrei Girbea. It would depend on the workload.
If it's something that balances well over 8 threads, you won't get better performance this way. The CPU normally does a pretty good job adjusting its speed within the thermal and Power-limit constraints. Undervolting is something I recommend, but otherwise I'd leave things on auto. Are you actually testing the battery life, or are you calculating using the watt numbers you get? Hi, Thanks for the well written review. I'm going to order the i5 version with 16GB memory which I read in another review would probably perform close to the same as the i7 in many cases due to the i7 throttling to keep heat down.
Plus, for my usage I do not think I need an i7. If I was doing any tacks that needed processor power I would use my desktop. I have a question on the FHD, I'm trying to decide on that screen nits for the brightness and better battery life or the WQHD for a sharper picture maybe more color accurate? What I wondered was during your testing did you notice any excessive ghosting which can be present with low power screens, or did you find the ghosting to be minimal?
Hi Kirk. I didn't notice any ghosting. I think the fhd screen is fine, especially at 14". I haven't seen the qhd, but I'd take the fhd for the power savings and the added brightness. This is odd as another article clearly states that nits low power display from Lenovo develops terrible ghosting. NBC has equipment to measure the actual response time, so those numbers are pretty legit. It's not an ideal response time, but I didn't notice it during my use.
Then again, I wasn't gaming on this laptop either, so it's no surprise I couldn't tell. It's not an easy thing to notice unless you're particularly sensitive to it or are playing games that require a fast time. On the Lenovo. Folks who have experimented with struggling to hear ANY sound whatsoever coming from those speakers came up empty! Zero sounds coming out from those speakers.
One guy who found a youtube video which is a Dolby demo video said on THAT one specific video, he was able to hear a little bit of sound coming from those speakers. Besides that, none whatsoever. Others concurred. May I please ask if you might be able to discuss this lack of any audio from the new speakers upward facing north of the keyboard issue please?
At first I thought the same thing. In fact, in my first draft it was actually a complaint because I had no idea what the holes were for. Once I figured out they were tweeters, I spent a lot more time and figured out that they only play very high frequency sounds.
And it's definitely not as loud. This might be by design, but I'm not sure. The speakers as a whole sounded good so I didn't mind that they aren't as loud as the bottom. I'd rather have full, clear sound than something that's pushed too far and sounds crackly. I've definitely seen my fair share of failures for quad speakers on laptops.
As a long time audiophile, and as someone who just cancelled my X1C7 order my arrival date is for Oct 16th though i ordered on Aug 1st!! One good test would be to choose a piece of music that we know has a lot of cymbals, triangles, and such high pitched percussive instruments. These high frequencies of "ding ding ding…" and such would most likely emanate from the top facing speakers.
May I please request that if possible, that you kindly please perform such a test, please? Thank you Derek in advance. This is a pretty standard approach used by various speaker designers and it gets applied in many guises. Essentially low frequency bass sounds take more power to create at a volume that we can hear, so techniques are used to increase the efficiency.
These include letting the sounds fire towards a hard surface as in this case, or putting a box with an open tube on one side to impedance match with the air. These efficiency improvements can come at a cost, and this can include a poor group delay response 'ringing on' or uneven frequency response. Thankfully, our ears aren't too sensitive to this for bass sounds, so designers can get away with it. For high frequency treble sounds this isn't the case — in most scenarios you want the speakers facing you, since the ear is most sensitive to imperfections in this frequency range.
Could you compare this to the Lenovo S 14"? The u version has been a solid all-rounder for me but with lots of little things that could be improved. I can't unfortunately because I've never actually had a S in my hand. In general though, Ideapads are less robust than the Thinkpad lineup and are maid more for the mainstream crowd.
Hence the cost difference. If you're super careful with your machines, an Ideapad can last a very long time. But it will definitely show it's age with typical use. Not really the same kind of laptop, but good value for the money. I'm Luis from Portugal, an ultrabookreview avid reader since The laptop's full package an Asus ZenBook UM btw seems great by now thin, so well-built it seems a solid peace of metal , but, randomly, from time to time, the SmartScreen.
I'm running Windows 10 version , because I didn't have time to upgrade to yet. Now, the questions. You review lots of laptops, and you always achieve great battery life on those who are built to deliver it. Do you review all laptops as you get them? Or do you make some changes in configuration? Did you ever stumble on a laptop which behaved like mine? Because I'm sure that, would you review my laptop now, It wouldn't deliver the battery life it's suposed to deliver.
Microsoft always touted it's newer OSs as lighter than the previous ones, but I'm not seeing it. Updated the latest drivers and bios for Asus's website, as well as the latest Windows updates, etc. Then try to google this exact problem and look for fixes, if it still persists. Your email address will not be published. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.
Next on my list is the Lenovo Yoga 9i. Best Holiday Deals on ultrabooks and portable laptops. Intel Core iH benchmarks vs. Best Chromebooks of — comparisons, reviews, buying guide. Real notebook reviews and analysis by real people. Reviews Guides. Compared to the previous models, this X1 Carbon 7th gen improves in the screens, audio and noise-levels, but settles for shorter battery life and some performance limitations in demanding loads.
We'll talk about all these aspects in the review below. Our score: 4. THE GOOD thin and light and well made excellent typing experience and dual biometrics beautiful full gamut 4k screen, with other screen options as well multiple configuration options runs well, cooly and quietly with daily use pretty good audio this time around still decent battery life, especially with the FHD screen variants. THE BAD the brightness settings are not spread out evenly overheats and limits the performance in demaning loads gets hot with demaning loads smaller battery than on previous models.
Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more. Share this article: Twitter Facebook Reddit. In addition to being a tech enthusiast, Derek has a career as a biomedical engineer. He enjoys taking things apart, figuring out how they work and finding ways to make them better.
His other hobbies include spending time with his family, "Do it yourself" projects such as home automation and running. You may also like Matteo B August 23, at am. Derek Sullivan August 23, at am. Andrei Girbea August 23, at am.
DavidC1 August 25, at pm. Derek Sullivan August 25, at pm. It's calculated based of average wattage during use for a set period of time. Kirk Diaz August 26, at am. Thanks, Kirk. Derek Sullivan August 26, at am. Kirk August 26, at pm. Thanks Derek, I was leaning that way so great to get some confirmation. The p screen managed a solid The 4K screen is also exceptionally bright, registering Both systems easily handled everything we threw at them. On Geekbench 4.
Those hover slightly above and below the premium laptop category average of 16, Somewhat surprisingly, the Core iU-powered HP Spectre x scored a few hundred points lower than either Carbon. Both of those are a bit below the However, strangely, the Core i5 version of the Carbon actually finished faster, completing the same task in When we reran the test, the Core i5 model still came out on top. To find out how the X1 Carbon 7th Gen performs during sustained workloads, we ran Cinebench R15 ten times in a row while measuring the clock speed and CPU temperature.
The Core iU model, which Intel rates for a max turbo speed of 3. But after one minute it hit 97 degrees Celsius and started downclocking to 3. At times the speed dropped as low as 2. Throughout the run test, the CPU had an average clock speed of 2. It got a high score of on the first run and a low score of on run six. The Core iU has a rated maximum boost speed of 4. It floated between 2.
With its integrated Intel UHD graphics processor, the ThinkPad X1 Carbon is just good enough for watching videos and playing low-end games, but forget about doing high-end video editing or gaming. On 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited, a synthetic test that measures graphics prowess, the X1 Carbon with the Core i7 scored a slightly-below-average 86,, while the Core i5 version hit 81, When we played Dirt 3, a very low-end racing game, the Core i7 model, which also had a 4K screen, hit a mediocre 27 fps frames per second , while the Core i5 model managed a barely-playable 31 fps.
Both are less than half of the category average. Available only in traditional ThinkPad black, the X1 Carbon now comes with an optional carbon-fiber-weave lid that has the same, attractive cross-hatch pattern that Dell used to have on all of its XPS 13 and 15 models. However, to get that lid, you need to buy the model with the 4K HDR display.
At It remains one of the sveltest ultrabooks on the market, tipping the scales at 0. The right side has a second Type-A port, a Kensington lock slot and, very strangely, the power button. The button is also pretty small, which makes it less-than-pleasant to find by fumbling with your fingers.
The ThinkPad X1 Carbon comes standard with a fingerprint reader in the deck. If you also want facial recognition, you can get the optional IR camera that works with Windows Hello to log you in with a glance. The ThinkPad X1 Carbon is available with two different webcam options: one with an IR camera for facial recognition and one without. We tested both and, surprisingly, the model without the IR camera provided noticeably better image quality.
When I captured images of my face under the flourescent lights of my office, my face appeared sharp and accurate with non-IR-enabled webcam, but somewhat blurrier and overly red on the one with IR. So, unless you really want that facial recognition feature, we recommend getting the non-IR camera. Both models I tested had snappy, tactile keys that provided a solid 1. The soft-touch deck improves the experience by providing a comfortable resting place for your wrists. Due to the excellent keyboard, I hit a strong words per minute on the 10FastFingers typing test, which is a bit higher than my typical 95 to wpm.
Like other ThinkPads, the X1 Carbon has two different pointing devices: a buttonless touchpad and a bright red TrackPoint pointing stick. While not everyone loves the nub as much as I do, it offers the most accurate and efficient way to navigate around the desktop. Using the TrackPoint, you can target very precise spots on the desktop, without having to lift your hands off of the home row. The spacious, buttonless pad was smooth as butter in our tests and responded immediately to multitouch gestures such as pinch-to-zoom and three-finger swipe.
It uses Windows Precision Touchpad drivers. The ThinkPad X1 Carbon will get you through a work day, if you choose the model with the p panel. It endured for a mere 5 hours and 33 minutes on our test. The X1 Carbon Gen 7 stayed mostly cool throughout our testing.
Meet the 7th gen of our legendary Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon laptop, even thinner and lighter than its predecessor at just lbs/kg and now with the. Shop and get up to 40% off now on the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 7 lighter, thinner business laptop. ✓ Up to 18 hours battery life. ✓FREE SHIPPING". dixitcorporate.com: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 7th Generation Ultrabook: Core iU, 16GB RAM, GB SSD, 14" FHD Display, Backlit Keyboard: Electronics.